Re: Man page doc for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Eric

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/18/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>>
>> +
>> +.BR SEEK_DATA
>> +and
>> +.BR SEEK_HOLE
>> +are nonstandard extensions also present in Solaris.
>
> Looks good to me, but you may also want to link to the proposed wording for
> mandating SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA in the eventual POSIX Issue 8 (POSIX 2008 is
> Issue 7):
> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=415
>
> Also, it seems a shame that the kernel can fail with EINVAL instead of
> properly emulating SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA even on file systems with no
> underlying support for reporting holes.

Thanks for catching that. I've added that point.

Cheers,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface"; http://man7.org/tlpi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux