Re: [PATCH 1/7] BTRFS: Fix lseek return value for error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



在 2011-9-18,下午4:42, Marco Stornelli 写道:

> Il 18/09/2011 09:29, Jeff Liu ha scritto:
>> Hi Andreas and Andi,
>> 
>> Thanks for your comments.
>> 
>> On 09/18/2011 09:46 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> 
>>>>> with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
>>>>> file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
>>>>> 
>>>>>                if (offset>= inode->i_size) {
>>>>>                        mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>>>>>                        return -ENXIO;
>>>>>                }
>>>> 
>>>> Except that is wrong, because it would then be impossible to write sparse files.
>> 
>> Per my tryout, except that, if the offset>= source file size, call
>> lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE) against Btrfs will always return
>> the total file size rather than -ENXIO.  however, our desired result it
>> -ENXIO in this case, Am I right?
>> 
> 
> Yes, ENXIO should be the operation result.

Thanks for your kind confirmation.


-Jeff

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux