Re: [PATCH 10/18] writeback: dirty position control - bdi reserve area

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 20:31 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > +   x_intercept = min(write_bw, freerun);
> > > +   if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept) {
> > 
> > So the point of the freerun point is that we never throttle before it,
> > so basically all the below shouldn't be needed at all, right? 
> 
> Yes!
> 
> > > +           if (bdi_dirty > x_intercept / 8) {
> > > +                   pos_ratio *= x_intercept;
> > > +                   do_div(pos_ratio, bdi_dirty);
> > > +           } else
> > > +                   pos_ratio *= 8;
> > > +   }
> > > +
> > >     return pos_ratio;
> > >  }

Does that mean we can remove this whole block?

> > 
> > So why not add:
> > 
> >       if (likely(dirty < freerun))
> >               return 2;
> > 
> > at the start of this function and leave it at that?
> 
> Because we already has
> 
>         if (nr_dirty < freerun)
>                 break;
> 
> in the main balance_dirty_pages() loop ;)

Bah! I keep missing that ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux