On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:43:22 -0400, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:55:32PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > We will need to call iop->permission and iop->get_acl from > > inode_change_ok() for additional permission checks, and both take a > > non-const inode. > > OK, the essential difference being that richacls have a say in whether > we can change attributes or not, which posix acls (for example) don't? > yes, next patch explain the details of the check -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
