On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:58:29AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > What additional kernel patches are required to bring that effort to a > > usable state and where are those patches? > > * The one you've already accepted with ->statfs for pipefs. > * PTRACE_SEIZE set from Tejun (RFC was sent some time earlier) > * CLONE_USEPID flag for the clone() syscall (Cyrill will re-send a bit later) Is that the last CLONE_ flag? Does it fully support nesting of pid namespaces? What happened to the idea of using the existing eclone patches instead? Cheers, -Matt Helsley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
