On Mon 22-08-11 11:38:47, Curt Wohlgemuth wrote:
> Add a new file, /proc/writeback, which displays
> machine global data for how many pages were cleaned for
> which reasons.
I'm not sure about the placement in /proc/writeback - maybe I'd be
happier if it was somewhere under /sys/kernel/debug but I don't really have
a better suggestion and I don't care that much either. Maybe Christoph or
Andrew have some idea?
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
> index bdda069..5168ac9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/writeback.h
> +++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ enum wb_reason {
> WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES,
> WB_REASON_SYNC,
> WB_REASON_PERIODIC,
> + WB_REASON_FDATAWRITE,
> WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER,
> WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM,
> WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE,
> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ enum wb_reason {
> WB_REASON_MAX,
> };
>
> +
The additional empty line doesn't make much sense here?
> /*
> * A control structure which tells the writeback code what to do. These are
> * always on the stack, and hence need no locking. They are always initialised
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index 474bcfe..6613391 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
...
> @@ -56,9 +60,77 @@ void bdi_lock_two(struct bdi_writeback *wb1, struct bdi_writeback *wb2)
> }
> }
>
> +
And another empty line here?
> +static const char *wb_stats_labels[WB_REASON_MAX] = {
> + [WB_REASON_BALANCE_DIRTY] = "page: balance_dirty_pages",
> + [WB_REASON_BACKGROUND] = "page: background_writeout",
> + [WB_REASON_TRY_TO_FREE_PAGES] = "page: try_to_free_pages",
> + [WB_REASON_SYNC] = "page: sync",
> + [WB_REASON_PERIODIC] = "page: periodic",
> + [WB_REASON_FDATAWRITE] = "page: fdatawrite",
> + [WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER] = "page: laptop_periodic",
> + [WB_REASON_FREE_MORE_MEM] = "page: free_more_memory",
> + [WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE] = "page: fs_free_space",
> +};
I don't think it's good to have two enum->string translation tables for
reasons. That's prone to errors which is in fact proven by the fact that
you ommitted FORKER_THREAD reason here.
> @@ -157,6 +248,7 @@ static inline void bdi_debug_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
> }
> #endif
>
> +
Another empty line here? You seem to like them ;)
> static ssize_t read_ahead_kb_store(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
