> Primarily because of code complexity. We are stashing away a pointer and > not taking any reference anywhere. So I am not even sure who is making > sure that request queue is not gone and there are no comments in the code > about why we are stashing a pointer and how are we making sure that > request queue is around for the lifetime of bdev. Can you point out a concrete problem in my approach? This seems rather vague. If you have an alternative way to get the 0.3% I would be also interested. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
