Re: Remount read-only races?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 14:09 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>   Toshiyuki reported an ext3 error message which implies that we can have
> unlinked but open files on read-only filesystem. Apparently open+unlink
> races with remount in some way. Looking at code in do_remount_sb() I don't
> see what prevents open("file", O_WRONLY) to happen after the check
> fs_may_remount_ro() and before the filesystem is marked as read-only.
> So are we expected to prevent these races? If yes, do I just miss something
> or the above race is really there? Thanks for reply in advance.

Yes, that race is there.   I have a patchset to fix most of the races:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/18/94

I'll update it to the current kernel.

There's still one race that it doesn't fix, if the inode still has a
stray reference not obtained from open() after nlink has gone to zero.
This can be fixed by adding a counter similar to mnt_writers to the
superblock and incrementing it in drop_nlink().

Thanks,
Miklos





> 
> 								Honza


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux