Re: [patch] fs: add missing unlock in default_llseek()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/26/2011 10:25 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> A recent change in linux-next, 982d816581 "fs: add SEEK_HOLE and
> SEEK_DATA flags" added some direct returns on error, but it should
> have been a goto out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index 5907b49..179f1c3 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -166,8 +166,10 @@ loff_t default_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  			 * long as offset isn't at the end of the file then the
>  			 * offset is data.
>  			 */
> -			if (offset >= inode->i_size)
> -				return -ENXIO;
> +			if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
> +				retval = -ENXIO;
> +				goto out;
> +			}
>  			break;
>  		case SEEK_HOLE:
>  			/*
> @@ -175,8 +177,10 @@ loff_t default_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  			 * as long as offset isn't i_size or larger, return
>  			 * i_size.
>  			 */
> -			if (offset >= inode->i_size)
> -				return -ENXIO;
> +			if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
> +				retval = -ENXIO;
> +				goto out;
> +			}
>  			offset = inode->i_size;
>  			break;
>  	}

Eeek copy+paste bites me again.  Thanks

Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux