Re: [PATCH] fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:02:12AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> The following patch fixes the problem for me:

Good catch, can you send it with a proper signoff and description?

> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
> index cca00f4..2e23e3d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
> @@ -881,11 +881,14 @@ xfs_file_aio_write(
>  	/* Handle various SYNC-type writes */
>  	if ((file->f_flags & O_DSYNC) || IS_SYNC(inode)) {
>  		loff_t end = pos + ret - 1;
> +		int error;
>  
>  		xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, iolock);
> -		ret = -xfs_file_fsync(file, pos, end,
> +		error = -xfs_file_fsync(file, pos, end,
>  				      (file->f_flags & __O_SYNC) ? 0 : 1);

In addition xfs_file_fsync actually returns a normal negative error,
but that bug already existed before the fsync prototype change.  If you
resend the patch, can you fix it as well?

>  		xfs_rw_ilock(ip, iolock);
> +		if (error)
> +			ret = error;
>  	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux