On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:52:16AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:45:51AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > You know what... I doubt that you want to mess with ->d_seq checks here. > > It's definitely not Hugh's bug (unless he has bindings somewhere odd) and > > both ->mnt_mountpoint and ->mnt_root are pinned (and we are holding > > vfsmount_lock anyway). *inode assignment too early is a real bug, indeed, > > and we want to assign nd->seq if we cross mountpoint as both versions do, > > but check just before that is, in the best case, BUG_ON() fodder. We'd > > just found a vfsmount with ->mnt_mountpoint equal to path->dentry; it *can't* > > be stale, or we have a really nasty problem anyway. > > Kudos to neilb for spotting the pointless check, BTW; and no, his theory > that it might be needed since we could race with umount() is wrong - due to > vfsmount_lock being held. Updated, pushed. Please, pull from the usual place ( git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs-2.6.git/ for-linus ). Shortlog: Al Viro (1): Fix cifs_get_root() Linus Torvalds (1): vfs: fix race in rcu lookup of pruned dentry Diffstat: fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 100 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------------- fs/namei.c | 10 +++++- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html