Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] EVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting David Safford (safford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:57 -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> > There have been numerous cases in the past where a corrupt or invalid
> > filesystem causes kernel panics or even exploitable overflows or memory
> > corruption; see the history of the "fsfuzzer" tool for more information.
> 
> Seems to me code bugs in the kernel should be fixed, given the universal 
> practice of automounting of removable media, and loopback mounting 
> images, regardless of EVM.

Hi David,

yeah, this would also be nice for making people feel cozier about
supporting unprivileged fs mounts in general.  I wonder if a real
project around the idea of strengthening the robustness of the fs
code, starting with the superblock parsing for a few of the most
comment filesystems, could take off.  A combination of

  . code auditing and test (i.e. fsfuzzer)
  . moving parts of the code to unprivileged userspace
  . marking audited filesystems as unprivileged-mountable, in the
    way Miklos' patchset a few years ago did
  . so that those who want to can refuse auto-mount of any not
    audited filesystems.

-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux