On Mon, 18 July 2011 20:57:49 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:53:39AM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: > > On Mon, 18 July 2011 09:32:52 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 06:05:01PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: > > > > > xfs: > > > > ==== > > > > seqrd 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 > > > > 16384 4698 4424 4397 4402 4394 4398 4642 4679 > > > > 8192 6234 5827 5797 5801 5795 6114 5793 5812 > > > > 4096 9100 8835 8882 8896 8874 8890 8910 8906 > > > > 2048 14922 14391 14259 14248 14264 14264 14269 14273 > > > > 1024 23853 22690 22329 22362 22338 22277 22240 22301 > > > > 512 37353 33990 33292 33332 33306 33296 33224 33271 Your patch definitely helps. Bottom right number is 584741 now. Still slower than ext4 or btrfs, but in the right ballpark. Will post the entire block once it has been generated. Jörn -- Data dominates. If you've chosen the right data structures and organized things well, the algorithms will almost always be self-evident. Data structures, not algorithms, are central to programming. -- Rob Pike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
