Re: Union mount and lockdep design issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Overlayfs never locks both upper and lower at the same time, which means
>> there's no AB-BA locking dependency.  The lock orderings are:
>
> What you're talking about is not analogous to the situation I'm seeing with
> unionmount.
>
> You actually have three filesystems in overlayfs.  The interaction between
> overlayfs-and-upperfs and overlayfs-and-lowerfs is the equivalent in
> unionmount terms to upperfs-and-lowerfs.  This is where the lockdep issue
> lies.

Normally overlayfs would be immune to this, since lower/upper are
different filesystem types.  But overlayfs-over-overlayfs would see the
same lockdep warnings, right?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux