Re: [PATCH] hfsplus: Add record offset check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Hin-Tak Leung <hintak_leung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Corrupted disk may return record offset which is larger
>> than node size
>> and cause general protection fault like below:
>
> <snipped>
>
>> This patch add guard for this situation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naota@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Nacked. This isn't acceptable. Explained above.

'recoff' is read from disk which can be easily fuzzed to have an
offset that's larger than node_size, no? The kernel shouldn't oops in
that cases so what's the problem with the patch? (The changelog is
terribly vague, though, and needs to be fixed).

                                Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux