On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:14:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > With the inode LRUs moving to per-sb structures, there is no longer > a need for a global inode_lru_lock. The locking can be made more > fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU > operations of different filesytsems completely from each other. Btw, any reason this is not done for dcache_lru_lock? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html