On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 03:21:44PM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > +static inline int deny_write_access(struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
> > + int v, v1;
> > + for (v = atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount); v <= 0; v = v1) {
> > + v1 = atomic_cmpxchg(&inode->i_writecount, v, v + 1);
> ^^^^^
> Shouldn't i_writecount be decreased here. Looks like cut & paste problem to
> me.
Yes, it should and yes, it is. Thanks for spotting...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
