On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:44:33AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > (2011/06/02 16:00), Dave Chinner wrote: > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Іt is impossible to understand what the shrinkers are actually doing > > without instrumenting the code, so add a some tracepoints to allow > > insight to be gained. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++- > > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > This look good to me. I have two minor request. 1) please change patch order, > move this patch after shrinker changes. iow, now both this and [2/12] have > tracepoint change. I don't like it. No big deal - I'll just fold the second change (how shrinker->nr is passed into the tracepoint) into the first. Tracepoints should be first in the series, anyway, otherwise there is no way to validate the before/after effect of the bug fixes.... > 2) please avoid cryptic abbreviated variable > names. Instead, please just use the same variable name with > vmscan.c source code. So replace cryptic abbreviated names with slightly different cryptic abbreviated names? ;) Sure, I can do that... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
