Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:33:21 -0400
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1306998067-27659-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Can we get some comments from the MM folks for patches 1-3?  Those look
like some pretty urgent fixes for really dumb shrinker behaviour.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim
  - From: KOSAKI Motohiro

References:
- [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim
  - From: Dave Chinner

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion
Next by Date: Re: suse xfs patches
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/12] vmscan: shrinker->nr updates race and go wrong
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux