Re: [PATCH] locks: breaking read lease should not block read open

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:16:06PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> The lease code behavior during the lease-breaking process is strange.
> Fixing it completely would be complicated by the fact that the current
> code allows a lease break to downgrade the lease instead of necessarily
> removing it.
> 
> But I can't see what the point of that feature is.  And googling around
> and looking at the Samba code, I can't see any evidence that anyone uses
> it.  Think we could just do away with removing the ability to downgrade
> to satisfy a lease break?

Without having looked too deeply, just let me point out that
Samba here has a plain flaw. Early Linux Kernel versions
that we programmed against did not properly support read
only leases, so we did not implement that initially. If I
remember correctly we never got around to finally do it once
it became available. Eventually we will probably, as read
only leases are a pretty important feature to present to
CIFS clients.

Volker

-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux