Re: [PATCH 0/7] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:32:08 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> On Wed,  1 Jun 2011 14:46:13 +0200
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I'd like to ask for overlayfs to be merged into 3.1.
> 
> Dumb questions:
> 
> I've never really understood the need for fs overlaying.  Who wants it?
> What are the use-cases?

https://lwn.net/Articles/324291/

I think the strongest use case is that LIVE-DVD's want it to have a write-able
root filesystem which is stored on the DVD.

> 
> This sort of thing could be implemented in userspace and wired up via
> fuse, I assume.  Has that been attempted and why is it inadequate?

I think that would be a valid question if the proposal was large and
complex.  But overlayfs is really quite small and self-contained.

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux