On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:32:36 +0800 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Andrew, > > Here are the intented patches for upstream submission, rebased to v3.0-rc2: > > [PATCH 01/15] writeback: introduce .tagged_writepages for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage > [PATCH 02/15] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock > [PATCH 03/15] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned > [PATCH 04/15] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written > [PATCH 05/15] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target > [PATCH 06/15] writeback: refill b_io iff empty > [PATCH 07/15] writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock > [PATCH 08/15] writeback: elevate queue_io() into wb_writeback() > [PATCH 09/15] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time > [PATCH 10/15] writeback: add bdi_dirty_limit() kernel-doc > [PATCH 11/15] writeback: skip balance_dirty_pages() for in-memory fs > [PATCH 12/15] writeback: remove writeback_control.more_io > [PATCH 13/15] writeback: remove .nonblocking and .encountered_congestion > [PATCH 14/15] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode > [PATCH 15/15] writeback: trace event writeback_queue_io Looks OK to me, although I think a few of the changelogs are lacking important details. > They are git pullable from > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/writeback.git fs-writeback > Please ask Stephen to suck this into linux-next when ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
