On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:28:38PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:07:39PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Wu, Andrew, > > > > what's the plan for these for 2.6.40? We'll need to make some progress > > in this area, and even if we can't get everything it we should make sure > > to at least include the updated versions of those in -mm. But even > > some of the later ones are pretty low risk. > > Yes, except for patch 14 which does not include external behavior > changes besides the good full write chunk size for large files, the > patches not in -mm are pretty trivial ones. > > Aside from my simple tests, Alex also helped going through the LKP > tests with the patchset and find no writeback regressions. I'll rearrange the series and move patch 14 to the end, so that the patches come in order - 10 (updated) patches in -mm - 6 more trivial patches that is safe to go upstream after -rc1 - the current patch 14 and patch 16 (that depends on 14) Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
