Re: [PATCH 5/7] overlay filesystem (inode.c bad error path)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Erez Zadok <ezk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Done: reverted my ovl patches and applied yours.  And indeed, the NULL
> oopses don't show up after 10 minutes of running.  Just to be sure, I
> ran overlayfs on top of ext2, ext3, xfs, reiserfs, and tmps â no
> oopses.  And I wasn't able to reproduce the WARN_ON in ovl_permission.

Great, thanks for testing.  Pushed to .v9 branch.

> Are you interested in testing overlayfs on top of NFS at this time?

No, not as an upper layer.  NFS as a lower layer should work fine.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux