Re: [PATCH 0/7] overlay filesystem v9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 May 2011 19:05:58 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 07:44:54PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> 
> > Forgot to attach the patch?
> 
> Yep, should be in your inbox now.
> 
> > >
> > > With this in place I have been able to boot a Natty release live CD
> > > image, and upgrade it in place to the latest and greatest of everything.
> > > Very nice.  Thanks for your work continuing work on overlayfs.  It is
> > > starting to look good enough to merge.
> > >
> > > Comments?
> > 
> > I'd be happier if the LSM module were fixed not to peek inside the inode
> > structure.  Some filesystems (notably network ones) do not guarantee i_*
> > to be up-to-date, relying on these is not a good idea.
> 
> I wonder what what the official way to get ownership information for an
> inode is if we cannot rely on those.  I am happy to get the Yama LSM
> fixed up if they are doing something wrong.
> 
> -apw

inode->getattr(...., &kstat);
look at kstat.uid, kstat.gid.

??

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux