On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 15:03 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > Changelog since V1 > o kswapd should sleep if need_resched > o Remove __GFP_REPEAT from GFP flags when speculatively using high > orders so direct/compaction exits earlier > o Remove __GFP_NORETRY for correctness > o Correct logic in sleeping_prematurely > o Leave SLUB using the default slub_max_order > > There are a few reports of people experiencing hangs when copying > large amounts of data with kswapd using a large amount of CPU which > appear to be due to recent reclaim changes. > > SLUB using high orders is the trigger but not the root cause as SLUB > has been using high orders for a while. The following four patches > aim to fix the problems in reclaim while reducing the cost for SLUB > using those high orders. > > Patch 1 corrects logic introduced by commit [1741c877: mm: > kswapd: keep kswapd awake for high-order allocations until > a percentage of the node is balanced] to allow kswapd to > go to sleep when balanced for high orders. > > Patch 2 prevents kswapd waking up in response to SLUBs speculative > use of high orders. > > Patch 3 further reduces the cost by prevent SLUB entering direct > compaction or reclaim paths on the grounds that falling > back to order-0 should be cheaper. > > Patch 4 notes that even when kswapd is failing to keep up with > allocation requests, it should still go to sleep when its > quota has expired to prevent it spinning. > > My own data on this is not great. I haven't really been able to > reproduce the same problem locally. > > The test case is simple. "download tar" wgets a large tar file and > stores it locally. "unpack" is expanding it (15 times physical RAM > in this case) and "delete source dirs" is the tarfile being deleted > again. I also experimented with having the tar copied numerous times > and into deeper directories to increase the size but the results were > not particularly interesting so I left it as one tar. > > In the background, applications are being launched to time to vaguely > simulate activity on the desktop and to measure how long it takes > applications to start. > > Test server, 4 CPU threads, x86_64, 2G of RAM, no PREEMPT, no COMPACTION, X running > LARGE COPY AND UNTAR > vanilla fixprematurely kswapd-nowwake slub-noexstep kswapdsleep > download tar 95 ( 0.00%) 94 ( 1.06%) 94 ( 1.06%) 94 ( 1.06%) 94 ( 1.06%) > unpack tar 654 ( 0.00%) 649 ( 0.77%) 655 (-0.15%) 589 (11.04%) 598 ( 9.36%) > copy source files 0 ( 0.00%) 0 ( 0.00%) 0 ( 0.00%) 0 ( 0.00%) 0 ( 0.00%) > delete source dirs 327 ( 0.00%) 334 (-2.10%) 318 ( 2.83%) 325 ( 0.62%) 320 ( 2.19%) > MMTests Statistics: duration > User/Sys Time Running Test (seconds) 1139.7 1142.55 1149.78 1109.32 1113.26 > Total Elapsed Time (seconds) 1341.59 1342.45 1324.90 1271.02 1247.35 > > MMTests Statistics: application launch > evolution-wait30 mean 34.92 34.96 34.92 34.92 35.08 > gnome-terminal-find mean 7.96 7.96 8.76 7.80 7.96 > iceweasel-table mean 7.93 7.81 7.73 7.65 7.88 > > evolution-wait30 stddev 0.96 1.22 1.27 1.20 1.15 > gnome-terminal-find stddev 3.02 3.09 3.51 2.99 3.02 > iceweasel-table stddev 1.05 0.90 1.09 1.11 1.11 > > Having SLUB avoid expensive steps in reclaim improves performance > by quite a bit with the overall test completing 1.5 minutes > faster. Application launch times were not really affected but it's > not something my test machine was suffering from in the first place > so it's not really conclusive. The kswapd patches also did not appear > to help but again, the test machine wasn't suffering that problem. > > These patches are against 2.6.39-rc7. Again, testing would be > appreciated. These patches solve the problem for me. I've been soak testing the file copy test for 3.5 hours with nearly 400 test cycles and observed no lockups at all - rock solid. From my observations from the output from vmstat the system is behaving sanely. Thanks for finding a solution - much appreciated! > > Documentation/vm/slub.txt | 2 +- > mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++- > mm/slub.c | 5 +++-- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++- > mm/slub.c | 3 ++- > mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++++- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
