Re: Please don't hijack patches - even trivial ones (was: Re: [PATCH 13/14] HPFS: Move declaration up, so that there are no out-of-scope pointers=

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 9 May 2011, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> On Sun, 8 May 2011, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> 
> > Move declaration up, so that there are no out-of-scope pointers
> > 
> > Reported-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 

So change it to:

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Hmm. I'm a little currious how my original Signed-off-by got turned into a 
> Reported-by for this patch?

I don't know. I probably checked the code independently after your report 
and ended up fixing exactly the same thing that you fixed.

Mikulas

> This patch is *exactely* the one I submitted on Dec 24 in a message with 
> Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1012242020090.28973@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Ok, it's a trivial little thing, but still. When the patch is completely 
> unchanged I think it's a little steep to change the original authors 
> Signed-off-by and essentially claim authorship of the patch for one self.
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  fs/hpfs/ea.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6.39-rc5-fast/fs/hpfs/ea.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.39-rc5-fast.orig/fs/hpfs/ea.c	2011-05-05 01:03:00.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.39-rc5-fast/fs/hpfs/ea.c	2011-05-05 01:03:01.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int hpfs_read_ea(struct super_block *s, 
> >  	unsigned pos;
> >  	int ano, len;
> >  	secno a;
> > +	char ex[4 + 255 + 1 + 8];
> >  	struct extended_attribute *ea;
> >  	struct extended_attribute *ea_end = fnode_end_ea(fnode);
> >  	for (ea = fnode_ea(fnode); ea < ea_end; ea = next_ea(ea))
> > @@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ int hpfs_read_ea(struct super_block *s, 
> >  	ano = fnode->ea_anode;
> >  	pos = 0;
> >  	while (pos < len) {
> > -		char ex[4 + 255 + 1 + 8];
> >  		ea = (struct extended_attribute *)ex;
> >  		if (pos + 4 > len) {
> >  			hpfs_error(s, "EAs don't end correctly, %s %08x, len %08x",
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux