On 05/02/2011 04:24 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:22:45PM +0300, Surbhi Palande wrote:
This has another advantage, that it rightfully does not let you
update the access time when the F.S is frozen (touch_atime called
from a read path when the F.S is frozen) Otherwise we also need to
fix this path.
In most filesystens atime updates aren't transactional. They just
get written into inode->i_atime, and at some later point when the
VFS tries to clean the inode it gets writtent back, either through
a transaction or not.
Yes, agreed. But then when a F.S is frozen the inode should not be
dirtied? Right? So this has to be fixed?
Also, in ext4, I think that updating atime starts a transaction.
Warm Regards,
Surbhi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
