Re: [Regression] 2.6.38 ncpfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 14 April 2011 19:29:34 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Bongani Hlope <bonganilinux@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> > The bug is caused by commit fb2d5b86aff355a27ebfc132d3c99f4a940cc3fe,
> > which was committed by Nick. Can you please either revert Nick's changes
> > or include the attached patch (or a better version, because I'm not that
> > clued up with ncpfs).
> 
> Hmm. Your patch isn't correct. You can't just do
> 
>    if (!mutex_is_locked(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex)) {
>       mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> 
> because code like that makes no sense - maybe it was locked by
> somebody _else_, and you would need to lock it.
> 
> That said, I do think that the
> 
>   BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex));
> 
> is wrong, since even the comment above it talks about the _parent_
> dentry, not the dentry that is actually being modified.
> 
> So there's clearly a bug somewhere, and the fix may be to just remove
> that BUG_ON().
> 
> Added some more people to the cc.
> 
>                                    Linus

Looking at the changes,  you are right. The BUG_ON() seems to be what is not 
suppose to be there. The attached patch only removes the BUG_ON(). I'll test 
on my work PC tomorrow and see if that also fixes the bug.

The previous code was:

               if (qname.len == newdent->d_name.len &&
                   memcmp(newdent->d_name.name, qname.name, newdent-
>d_name.len)) {
8<
                        */
                       if (inode)
                               mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
                       spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
                       spin_lock(&newdent->d_lock);
                       memcpy((char *) newdent->d_name.name, qname.name,
                                                               newdent-
>d_name.len);
                       spin_unlock(&newdent->d_lock);
                       spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
                       if (inode)
                               mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
               }

and it was replaced by:

       BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex));
       BUG_ON(dentry->d_name.len != name->len); /* d_lookup gives this */

       spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
       spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
       memcpy((unsigned char *)dentry->d_name.name, name->name, name->len);
       spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
       spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index ad25c4c..39fa508 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -2131,7 +2131,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_rehash);
  */
 void dentry_update_name_case(struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *name)
 {
-	BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex));
 	BUG_ON(dentry->d_name.len != name->len); /* d_lookup gives this */
 
 	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux