Re: [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:33:03PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:24:24PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > IIUC, so first we need to fix existing code where we seem to be moving
> > any inode on bdi writeback list based on I_DIRTY flag.
> 
> I_DIRTY is a set of flags.  Inodes are on the dirty list if any of
> the flags is set.
> 
> > BTW, what's the difference between I_DIRTY_DATASYNC and I_DIRTY_PAGES? To
> > me both seem to mean that data needs to be written back and not the
> > inode itself.
> 
> I_DIRTY_PAGES means dirty data (pages)
> I_DIRTY_DATASYNC means dirty metadata which needs to be written for fdatasync
> I_DIRTY_SYNC means dirty metadata which only needs to be written for fsync

Ok, that helps. Thanks. So an fdatasync() can write back some metadata
too if I_DIRTY_DATASYNC is set.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux