On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:09:25PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > Only a few file systems need this. Start by pushing it down into each > rename method so that it can be dealt with on a per-fs basis. What is the criteria for a filesystem needing this? > Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 3 +++ > fs/affs/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/afs/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/bfs/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +++ > fs/ceph/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/cifs/inode.c | 3 +++ > fs/coda/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 3 +++ > fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/ext2/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/ext3/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/ext4/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/fat/namei_msdos.c | 3 +++ > fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 3 +++ > fs/fuse/dir.c | 4 ++++ > fs/gfs2/ops_inode.c | 3 +++ > fs/hfs/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c | 3 +++ > fs/hpfs/namei.c | 4 ++++ > fs/jffs2/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/jfs/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/libfs.c | 3 +++ > fs/logfs/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/minix/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/namei.c | 5 +---- > fs/ncpfs/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/nfs/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/nilfs2/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/omfs/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/sysv/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/ubifs/dir.c | 3 +++ > fs/udf/namei.c | 3 +++ > fs/ufs/namei.c | 3 +++ > 36 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) You didn't push it down into XFS, hence my question.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
