Re: [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 29-03-11 15:09:21, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:35:13AM -0700, Chad Talbott wrote:
> > I'd like to propose a discussion topic:
> > 
> > IO-less Dirty Throttling Considered Harmful...
> > 
> 
> I see that writeback has extended session at 10.00. I am assuming
> IO less throttling will be discussed there. Is it possible to 
> discuss its effect on block cgroups there? I am not sure enough
> time is there because it ties in memory cgroup also.
> 
> Or there is a session at 12.30 "memcg dirty limits and writeback", it
> can probably be discussed there too.
  Yes, I'd like to have this discussion in this session if Greg agrees.
We've been discussing about how to combine IO-less throttling and memcg
awareness of the writeback and Greg was designing some framework to do
this... Greg?

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux