Kyungmin Park <kmpark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Again, this ioctl's design is unclear, and seems to be strange. I >> wouldn't want to add this before clearing it. Please explain what is >> right behavior. > > Umm it's out of my scope. it's trim design. > See also btrfs batched discard support. it's also no consideration as > you mentioned. > > As I know, now xfs, ext4, and btrfs support this fstrim without these concern. > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/9758 I looked at fstrim.c. It is lowlevel tools to just issue FITRIM - it doesn't use the result at all. Um. Honestly I'd like to see more or wait until real user for now, instead of providing unclear design. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
