Re: [RFC] block integrity: Fix write after checksum calculation problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 22-03-11 12:23:01, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:28:26PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > This seems like the best solution, IMHO, to ensure that mmap is blocked in
> > page_mkwrite() before it has any chance to dirty the page undergoing
> > checksum.  The trick is that you need to set_page_writeback() before setting
> > the page read-only, otherwise the race still exists.
> 
> I figured out that the recursive locking errors only happened in the
> set_memory_rw half of the ro/rw memory pair, and that I could make them go away
> (for now) by do set_memory_rw in the kintegrityd workqueue.  Then I added a
> call to set_page_writeback just prior to the set_memory_ro call, though that
> resulted in a lot of complaints about invalid page states and the like.  It
> would seem that the memory pages that arrive in bio_integrity_prep from jbd2
> don't have the writeback flag set, and setting it causes problems for it.  The
> writeback flag is set on all the pages that are associated with a checksum
> failure, I noticed.
  Yeah, pages submitted by jbd2 don't have writeback flag set because they
are metadata blocks written directly via buffer heads. But as you noted,
these are protected in a different way by the journalling layer so
shouldn't need to worry.

> As for changing pte's around... does that set_memory_ro change the pte flags
> for all running processes?  I'm not so sure it does for anything other than the
> current process.  I think I saw a flush_tlb call in there... though I don't
> think it helps me much.
> 
> If I /don't/ set the flag, the frequency of the errors decreases further to
> about once an hour, but I still see the occasional error. :/  Currently I'm
> trying to figure out how one might distinguish dirty pages that shouldn't have
> writeback set vs. pages that ought to have it but don't.
  It's difficult at the block layer... If page->mapping->host is not a
device inode, the page should have PageWriteback set. If it is a device
inode, you don't know - JBD2 will submit pages without PageWriteback set,
flusher thread will submit pages with PageWriteback set. And both is OK
since we use buffer state for synchronization.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux