Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] IO-less balance_dirty_pages() v2 (simple approach)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:46:23AM -0700, Curt Wohlgemuth wrote:
> But if one of one's goals is to provide some sort of disk isolation based on
> cgroup parameters, than having at most one stream of write requests
> effectively neuters the IO scheduler.

If you use any kind of buffered I/O you already fail in that respect.
Writeback from balance_dirty_page really is just the wort case right now
with more I/O supposed to be handled by the background threads.  So if
you want to implement isolation properly you need to track the
originator of the I/O between the copy to the pagecache and actual
writeback.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux