Re: [git pull] VFS - the first pile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:32:48PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Shortlog:
> Al Viro (45):
>       compat breakage in preadv() and pwritev()

BTW, a question about rebases: is that kind of situation worth doing
a rebase of the queue/backmerge/etc.?

This commit sits in the base of that branch, with branchpoint at Mar 10;
the same thing had been applied in mainline at Mar 13.  git merge does,
of course, handle it just fine; I guess I should've posted a pull request
back then instead of posting the patch - to be honest, I hadn't thought
about that.

What's the prefered way of dealing with such situations?  Leave as is?
Rebase at the point where the patch went into mainline?  Something else?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux