On 03/11/2011 01:43 PM, Greg Thelen wrote:
Add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty page limits: Direct write-out is controlled with: - memory.dirty_ratio - memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes Background write-out is controlled with: - memory.dirty_background_ratio - memory.dirty_background_limit_bytes
What's the overlap, if any, with the current memory limits controlled by `memory.limit_in_bytes` and the above `memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes`? If I want to fairly balance memory between two cgroups be one a dirty page antagonist (dd) and the other an anonymous page (memcache), do I just set `memory.limit_in_bytes`? Does this patch simply provide a more granular level of control of the dirty limits?
Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
