On Mon, March 14, 2011 02:45, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 03/13/2011 09:31 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote: >> The new syscall works on only one fd too. The behaviour of the proposed >> syncfs and an extended sync_file_range is exactly the same. > > No, it's not. You should read the patch before commenting. Have you read my sync_file_range patch? Because it's exactly the same code, but put in sync_file_range instead of a new system call. How that can have different behaviour, I have no idea. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
