On Mon, March 14, 2011 02:37, Theodore Tso wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote: > >> The new syscall works on only one fd too. The behaviour of the proposed >> syncfs and an extended sync_file_range is exactly the same. > > No, it's quite different. One syncs the entire file system; sync_file_range > requests that the pages associated with a file be pushed to disk --- it says > nothing about the metadata associated with the file. You missed the part where a new flag for sync_file_range would be added that does sync the whole file system. > I'm in favor of the new sys_syncfs system call. Care to define its behaviour? Does it wait till all data is written out, does it flush disk caches, what if new data is written to the fs while a sync is going on, etc. Greetings, Indan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
