On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:25:35 +1100 Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Trond Myklebust > <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 11:44 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > >> But we could just check for d_count != 0 which means the parent has > >> to be valid as well (we have rename protection as well). > > > > That would certainly be less intrusive. Can you please propose a patch? > > Yes I'll write something up today. Hi Nick, I was doing some testing earlier and noticed that NFS sillyrenames are still broken as of -rc7. Did you ever get around to doing a patch to fix this? Thanks, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
