On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Mark Lord <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11-03-03 12:45 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> If you can change whatever user-land process that does the reboot
>> system call (and clearly you can, since you're adding new commands and
>> using those), then why the heck don't you just do the remount-ro from
>> that same user land?
>
> Is there a system call for emergency_remount_*() ?
> I've been writing to /proc/proc/sysrq-trigger to accomplish this.
So I don't know what this has to do with "emergency_remount()" - we're
talking about a regular controlled shutdown/reset. The fact that the
patch used the emergency_remount() code seems to be purely an
implementation issue, nothing more.
And while sysrq-trigger certainly works (when it's enabled, but that's
true of /proc too, of course), I do think it's a rather odd way of
solving the problem, when the simple "just remount read-only" is what
the code actually _wants_ to do.
But you're certainly right that it takes less code to open
/proc/sysrq-trigger and writing a single byte to it than it does to do
the straightforward "let's just do the normal mount thing".
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
