On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:05:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:52:55 -0800 akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2011-03-02-16-52 has been uploaded to > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ > > If you create your linux-next.patch using kapm-start..kapm-end in the > linux-next tree, you will save about 8000+ lines of patch and you won't > need "next-remove-localversion.patch" any more. I am keeping those > references up to date each day. What's in the 8000 lines? > BTW, To keep "git am" happy: > > diff --git a/broken-out/memcg-keep-only-one-charge-cancelling-function-fix.patch > index e081c43..42c45fc 100644 > --- a/broken-out/memcg-keep-only-one-charge-cancelling-function-fix.patch > +++ b/broken-out/memcg-keep-only-one-charge-cancelling-function-fix.patch > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > +From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Keep the underscore-version of the charge cancelling function which took a > page count, rather than silently changing the semantics of the > Didn't understand that - why is git-am unhappy? Your sentence was truncated. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
