This is similar to what ceph, ocfs2 and nfs does http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-fsdevel/2008/4/18/1498534 May be we should get vfs fixed Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c index eaa089c..52dacbb 100644 --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c @@ -895,6 +895,11 @@ clunk_newdir: clear_nlink(new_inode); else drop_nlink(new_inode); + /* + * Work around vfs rename rehash bug with + * FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE + */ + v9fs_invalidate_inode_attr(new_inode); } if (S_ISDIR(old_inode->i_mode)) { if (!new_inode) -- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
