On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Charles Manning wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Charles Manning <cdhmanning@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c | 408 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.h | 33 ++++
> 2 files changed, 441 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c
> create mode 100644 fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.h
>
> diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..997a618
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,408 @@
> +/*
> + * YAFFS: Yet Another Flash File System. A NAND-flash specific file system.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2002-2011 Aleph One Ltd.
> + * for Toby Churchill Ltd and Brightstar Engineering
> + *
> + * Created by Charles Manning <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include "yaffs_checkptrw.h"
> +#include "yaffs_getblockinfo.h"
> +
> +static int yaffs2_checkpt_space_ok(struct yaffs_dev *dev)
> +{
> + int blocks_avail = dev->n_erased_blocks - dev->param.n_reserved_blocks;
> +
> + yaffs_trace(YAFFS_TRACE_CHECKPOINT,
> + "checkpt blocks_avail = %d", blocks_avail);
> +
> + return (blocks_avail <= 0) ? 0 : 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int yaffs_checkpt_erase(struct yaffs_dev *dev)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!dev->param.erase_fn)
> + return 0;
> + yaffs_trace(YAFFS_TRACE_CHECKPOINT,
> + "checking blocks %d to %d",
> + dev->internal_start_block, dev->internal_end_block);
> +
> + for (i = dev->internal_start_block; i <= dev->internal_end_block; i++) {
Why does 'i' need 'function scope'? can't it just have 'for scope'?
for (int i = dev->internal_start_block; i <= dev->internal_end_block; i++) {
> +static void yaffs2_checkpt_find_erased_block(struct yaffs_dev *dev)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int blocks_avail = dev->n_erased_blocks - dev->param.n_reserved_blocks;
> +
> + yaffs_trace(YAFFS_TRACE_CHECKPOINT,
> + "allocating checkpt block: erased %d reserved %d avail %d next %d ",
> + dev->n_erased_blocks, dev->param.n_reserved_blocks,
> + blocks_avail, dev->checkpt_next_block);
> +
> + if (dev->checkpt_next_block >= 0 &&
> + dev->checkpt_next_block <= dev->internal_end_block &&
> + blocks_avail > 0) {
> +
> + for (i = dev->checkpt_next_block; i <= dev->internal_end_block;
'for scope' ?
> +static void yaffs2_checkpt_find_block(struct yaffs_dev *dev)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct yaffs_ext_tags tags;
> +
> + yaffs_trace(YAFFS_TRACE_CHECKPOINT,
> + "find next checkpt block: start: blocks %d next %d",
> + dev->blocks_in_checkpt, dev->checkpt_next_block);
> +
> + if (dev->blocks_in_checkpt < dev->checkpt_max_blocks)
> + for (i = dev->checkpt_next_block; i <= dev->internal_end_block;
and here and elsewhere (can't be bothered to point out every one)...
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please.
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
