On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> /**
> * v9fs_file_open - open a file (or directory)
> * @inode: inode to be opened
> @@ -89,19 +86,12 @@ int v9fs_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> }
>
> file->private_data = fid;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE
> if ((fid->qid.version) && (v9ses->cache)) {
> P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "cached");
> - /* enable cached file options */
> - if(file->f_op == &v9fs_file_operations)
> - file->f_op = &v9fs_cached_file_operations;
> - else if (file->f_op == &v9fs_file_operations_dotl)
> - file->f_op = &v9fs_cached_file_operations_dotl;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE
> v9fs_cache_inode_set_cookie(inode, file);
> -#endif
> }
> -
> +#endif
> return 0;
> }
Doesn't this conditionalize all cached operations on FSCACHE operation?
What if we want loose cache policy without FSCACHE?
-eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
