Re: [PATCH 4/6] TTY: use appropriate printk priority level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:29:28PM -0800, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> printk()s without a priority level default to KERN_WARNING. To reduce
> noise at KERN_WARNING, this patch set the priority level appriopriately
> for unleveled printks()s. This should be useful to folks that look at
> dmesg warnings closely.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This doesn't apply to the latest linux-next tree, care to resend it
after refreshing it?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux