Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Drop ext2/ext3 codebase? When?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/3/11 1:32 PM, Michael Rubin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If we can have a real plan for moving in this direction though, I'd
>> support it.  I'm just not sure how we get enough real testing under
>> our belts to be comfortable with dropping ext[23], especially as
>> most distros now default to ext4 anyway.
> 
> Eric what sort of testing are you looking for?

Anything, the more formal or more widespread the better.

I just don't think it's used much this way today...

We can start with xfstests etc but I'd be more concerned about
unexpected behavioral or performance changes.

> I admit I like having ext2 around for comparisons in bug situations.
> It really helps to isolate the problem area. How painful is the
> upkeep?

since ext4 was merged, about 450 commits to ext2 & ext3 files.

since 2.6.32, about 150 commits.

Translating that into pain units, I dunno.  In distro-land, I often
have bugfixes that need to hit 2 or 3 of the filesystems as well.

-Eric

> mrubin
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux