Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Set printk priority level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:29:24 -0800, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:

> We've been burned by regressions/bugs which we later realized could have
> been triaged quicker if only we'd paid closer attention to dmesg.
> 
> This patch series fixes printk()s which appear in the logs of the device
> I'm currently working on. I'd love to fix all such printks but there are
> hundreds of files and thousands of LOC affected:
> 
> $ find . -name \*.c | xargs fgrep -c "printk(\"" | wc -l 16237
> $ find . -name \*.c | xargs fgrep "printk(\"" | wc -l 20745
> 

Yes, this is the right approach, every printk should have a
specified level.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux