On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:26 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Trond Myklebust > <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 17:36 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > >> Nick Piggin reports: > >> > >> > I'm getting use after frees in aio code in NFS > >> > > >> > [ 2703.396766] Call Trace: > >> > [ 2703.396858] [<ffffffff8100b057>] ? native_sched_clock+0x27/0x80 > >> > [ 2703.396959] [<ffffffff8108509e>] ? put_lock_stats+0xe/0x40 > >> > [ 2703.397058] [<ffffffff81088348>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xa8/0x140 > >> > [ 2703.397159] [<ffffffff8108a2a5>] lock_acquire+0x95/0x1b0 > >> > [ 2703.397260] [<ffffffff811627db>] ? aio_put_req+0x2b/0x60 > >> > [ 2703.397361] [<ffffffff81039701>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50 > >> > [ 2703.397464] [<ffffffff81612a31>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x41/0x80 > >> > [ 2703.397564] [<ffffffff811627db>] ? aio_put_req+0x2b/0x60 > >> > [ 2703.397662] [<ffffffff811627db>] aio_put_req+0x2b/0x60 > >> > [ 2703.397761] [<ffffffff811647fe>] do_io_submit+0x2be/0x7c0 > >> > [ 2703.397895] [<ffffffff81164d0b>] sys_io_submit+0xb/0x10 > >> > [ 2703.397995] [<ffffffff8100307b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > >> > > >> > Adding some tracing, it is due to nfs completing the request then > >> > returning something other than -EIOCBQUEUED, so aio.c > >> > also completes the request. > >> > >> To address this, prevent the NFS direct I/O engine from completing > >> async iocbs when the forward path returns an error other than > >> EIOCBQUEUED. > >> > >> This appears to survive ^C during both "xfstest no. 208" and "fsx -Z." > >> > >> Cc: Stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> Here's my take. > >> > >> fs/nfs/direct.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++--------------- > >> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c > >> index e6ace0d..c2176f4 100644 > >> --- a/fs/nfs/direct.c > >> +++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c > >> @@ -407,15 +407,16 @@ static ssize_t nfs_direct_read_schedule_iovec(struct nfs_direct_req *dreq, > >> pos += vec->iov_len; > >> } > >> > >> - if (put_dreq(dreq)) > >> - nfs_direct_complete(dreq); > >> - > >> - if (requested_bytes != 0) > >> - return 0; > >> + /* > >> + * If no bytes were started, return the error, and let the > >> + * generic layer handle the completion. > >> + */ > >> + if (requested_bytes == 0) > >> + return result < 0 ? result : -EIO; > >> > >> - if (result < 0) > >> - return result; > >> - return -EIO; > >> + if (put_dreq(dreq)) > >> + nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq, dreq->inode); > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > In nfs_direct_read_schedule_iovec()? Shouldn't that be > > nfs_direct_complete(dreq); > > > > Also, why is EIO the correct reply when no bytes were read/written? Why > > shouldn't the VFS aio code be able to cope with a zero byte reply? > > What would it do? Just return that zero byte reply to userland. zero bytes is a valid reply for ordinary read() and write(), so why should we have to do anything different for aio_read()/aio_write()? -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
