Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> writes: > But there's the second race I describe making it possible > for new IO to be created after io_destroy() has waited for all IO to > finish... Can't that be solved by introducing memory barriers around the accesses to ->dead? Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
